Monday, June 13, 2011

Journalists: To Tweet or Not to Tweet?


Twitter is changing the media landscape and has changed the way journalists are doing their jobs.  I made my Twitter account over a year ago, unwillingly.  I heard about the site and was told journalists were using it more and more.  As an aspiring journalist I figured I should see what it was all about.  At first I wasn’t sure how to use it.  I attended a social media workshop at a Society of Professional Journalists conference in NYC, taught by Sree Sreenivasan, a professor at Columbia’s Journalism School. 

He talked about the proper way to use Twitter and gave some guidelines.  I took points away that I thought were important; such as only one in every five tweets should be about you and reach out to other users (retweet and mention). 

After I had a better understanding of the site, I became addicted to the real-time news updates.  While having my account, I have seen many others who have used the site well, and others who do not.
Journalists rarely make their tweets private, and sometimes what they tweet can cause controversy. In February 2011 it was reported that CBS News chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan had been beaten and sexually assaulted while covering the Egyptian uprising.  Nir Rosen, a journalist who held a position at New York University, tweeted negatively about the incident.

Rosen tweeted Logan was trying to outdo CNN’s Anderson Cooper who was punched in the face during the uprising.  He also tweeted, “i apologize for being insensitive, its always wrong, that’s obvious, but i’m rolling my eyes at all the attention she will get.”  Rosen resigned from his position and his comments were condoned by NYU.  He apologized on Cooper’s show saying, “I was a jerk and I was being thoughtless.”  Watch reporters discuss the controversy here.

Journalists should also make sure their tweets are accurate as well as timely.  For example, during the media frenzy that occurred when the news broke about Osama bin Laden’s death; MSNBC reporter Norah O'Donnell tweeted "Obama shot and killed," citing her source as Jim Miklaszewski, NBC Chief Pentagon Correspondent.  Spell check and auto correct can make changes automatically, which can be overlooked.  Double checking one’s tweet only takes an extra minute, and can make a world of difference; especially today  when instant news is in high demand.


Fact checking is also an important step.  Journalists regularly fact check for stories, and they should follow this practice for sources they find on social media.  For example, during the recent tsunami in Japan, CNN brought a viewer on air via telephone that had been supposedly tweeting real time updates from Japan.  It turned out the viewer had been watching news coverage, and was not actually in Japan.  The phone call was terminated, but the situation could have been avoided if the source had been checked in advance.  While citizen journalists can be a resourceful and useful tool, news agencies utilizing them should precede carefully.

Despite the controversies, Twitter is a resourceful tool for journalists.  They can spread accurate information by sending out tweets that other users retweet on their own accounts, make contacts, send out their stories, follow real-time breaking news updates, find first person accounts for stories, etc.  Some news organizations are already doing this. The Huffington Post’s Arianna Huffington, president and editor-in-chief.  The Huffington Post itself has over one million followers, and Arianna has over 600 thousand.  She tweets pictures, retweets other accounts, promotes Huffington Post articles, mentions followers, etc; making her account interesting for her followers.

How are journalists using Twitter effectively? Ineffectively? If you're a journalist, what tips do you have for using the platform?

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Bin Laden and Breaking News

CNN reports Osama bin Laden is dead. #history
Photo by: Frank Gruber
Late evening on May 1, 2011, the news broke around the world that Osama bin Laden died.  This is being called a significant moment in American history, and even the history of the world.  The media coverage of the event has been overwhelming via every medium; television, phone calls, social media, news sites, etc.  There are real time updates of everything about the situation including breaking news tweets, status updates, blog posts, timelines, articles, extended coverage, and more.

The coverage of breaking news events has changed significantly with the progress of the Internet.  Before the Internet, social media sites, and smart phones; one found out about news via word of mouth and the next days paper.  Now there is real time updates of every type of breaking news.  For example, President Obama addressed the nation around 11:30 p.m.  His speech was broadcast on every major or news network in addition to being streamed live online.  The coverage is fueled by demand of the public, consumers want their news as fast as possible.  Check out this story from Poynter about the spread of the news via Twitter.
Really , Fox , really
Photo by: Kennedy Parmar

In leiu of this demand for instant news however, media sources need to be careful in what they report and the accuracy of these reports.  For example, an MSNBC reporter tweeted "Obama shot and killed," saying her source was Jim Miklaszewski, NBC Chief Pentagon Correspondent.  A local Fox station labeled their report, "Obama Bin Laden Dead."  On national Fox news, Osama's name was spelled "Usama."  To keep the trust of the public, the credibility of the news sources, as well as the journalists themselves; checking sources and spell checking still needs to be a top priority even when releasing news quickly.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

The New York Times: Print vs. Digital

One of the main concerns that many consumers have about the journalism industry is that print journalism is on the way out.  Newspapers and magazines are a thing of the past, everything is going digital.  The New York Times, which is a constant in the print journalism world, recently erected a paywall for their website.  The Times recently released they have 100,000 new subscribers since they installed this new policy, which brings in an estimated $26 million in revenue.  Evercore Partners analyst Doug Arthur said about the new subscribers, "It's an excellent figure...I (was) only looking for 200,000 subscribers in year one."  An estimated $13 million is being spent to promote the new online subscriptions.
Old News at Postmasters, March 2009
Photo credit: mandiberg
The downside of the policy is that there has been a 15 percent drop in the overall traffic of the site because of the article limitations, which was expected. The new subscribers are coming at a good time for The Times, their print advertising revenue is on the decline.  Their revenue declined 4.4 percent on a 7.5 percent drop in print ad revenue, even though their digital ad revenue rose 4.5 percent during the first quarter. Their net income fell 57.6 percent to 5.4 million (4 cents per share) from 12.8 million (8 cents per share) a year ago.

Other newspapers have also reported disappointing quarter results such as Gannett and Media General.  Other newspapers who have had success with charging for online access have been few, such as the News Corp's Wall Street Journal and Pearson Plc's Financial Times.

In this constant digital evolution, will there be room for print papers, even The New York Times?  Some have a more positive outlook than others.  The Onion, trying to find humor in the decline, released an article, "Why Did No One Inform Us Of the Imminent Death of the American Newspaper Industry?"  You can read it here.

What do you think?  Do you think the imminent death of the newspaper industry is inevitable or do you think consumers will never get enough of their print newspapers?

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Journalists Utilize Facebook

Social media has become an essential tool for journalists.  From sources to breaking news to interacting with the audience; sites such as Facebook and Twitter have become integral in journalists' everyday routine.  Top executives from Facebook have said they are looking to "strengthen its relationship with the news media and has already helped boost traffic to to news websites," according to the Huffington Post.

News sites and blogs have been using the Facebook "like" button as well as the recommend option more and more.  This leads to sharing between social  media friends and online connections.  This helps connections between these users.  Chief Operating Officer of Facebook Sheryl Sandberg said their site can help boost traffic as well as revenue, in addition to the advantage of real time.

Facebook also recently made pages for journalists who can connect with other journalists so they can take advantage of pages such as Journalists on Facebook and Facebook + Media.  This is meant to help journalists use social media as a tool for their reporting and sources.  Journalists will even be able to take classes to learn how to utilize this tool.

facebook logo
Photo credit: AJ Cann

Monday, April 11, 2011

Bias in the Media

     Bias is always a subject at the forefront of journalist's minds.  One of the number one rules in ethics of journalism is to remain unbiased.  Ethical journalists are always striving to show both sides of the story and use only facts, not assumptions.
     For example, the Society of Professional Journalists have a Code of Ethics.  This code of ethics promotes the idea that "public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy.  The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues...Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility."
     For example, some of the responsibilities in the Code of Ethics include, "Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise care to avoid inadvertent error, deliberate distortion is never permissible, support the open exchange of views, even views they found repugnant," and many others.

Below, Saturday Night Live recently poked fun at Fox News.


Fox News has the slogan "fair and balanced."  However, this may not be as true as people think.  According to a study conducted by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland, it shows that Fox News viewers are significantly more misinformed than those who consume their news from other sources.  For example, out of the following statements below, Fox News was in the first percentile of misinformed viewers.
  • 91 percent believe the stimulus legislation lost jobs
  • 72 percent believe the health reform law will increase the deficit
  • 72 percent believe the economy is getting worse
  • 60 percent believe climate change is not occurring
  • 49 percent believe income taxes have gone up
  • 63 percent believe the stimulus legislation did not include any tax cuts
  • 56 percent believe Obama initiated the GM/Chrysler bailout
  • 38 percent believe that most Republicans opposed TARP
  • 63 percent believe Obama was not born in the U.S. (or that it is unclear)
Even though Fox was in the first percentile, the study also stated CNN, MSNBC, and other broadcast networks also have a way to go before they can claim complete unbias.  You can see the full study here.

NPR Sign
Photo credit: Mr. T in DC
National Public Radio (NPR) has also been in the news recently concerning bias.  Former CEO Vivian Schiller resigned after videos surfaced of her and NPR's senior vice president Ron Schiller making comments about the Tea Party.  Schiller called the Tea Party "fanatically involved in people's personal lives and very fundamental[ly] Christian - I wouldn't even call it Christian...basically they believe in white, middle America, gun-toting - it's pretty scary.  They're seriously racist, racist people."  Both executives resigned.  It turned out the video (which you can check out here) was purposely edited by James O'Keefe, a conservative activist, who set up the meeting and secret video cameras.  Even though the video was edited did leave out other parts of the conversation, the House of Representatives did vote to take away NPR federal funding.  NPR is also seen by many as being liberally bias.

Today, many Americans feel as if it is difficult to find unbiased news.  According to the Boston Phoenix, in a Gallup poll last September, a majority of Americans, 57 percent, have "little or no trust in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately, and fairly."  In addition, with the plethora of news sources available, it can also be tough to know reporting from opinion.  This is why Americans look to national news sources for all the facts and information.  These sources need to be able to give this to America, and work on earning back their trust as well as remaining unbiased.

TV Shows We Used To Watch - 1955 Television advertising
Photo credit: Paul Townsead

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

New York Times Paywall: Success or Bust?

The New York Times recently installed a subscription system on their website.  After a user exhausts his or her 20 free articles each month, they are asked to buy a subscription (see previous post for more details).  As soon as 24-hours after the paywall was erected, users found ways to get around the it.
New York Times
Photo Credit: Ciccio Pizzettaro
  • A user in Canada named David Hayes created an applications, "NYClean."  It works by dragging the NYClean bookmark to the toolbar of your browser.  Anytime you are on the Times website and are blocked, click it.  You will be able to read the article as you were before the paywall was put into place.
  • The paywall does not work on Twitter and other social media sites.  If you click on an link that was posted to an account, it does not count against your 20 free articles. There are feeds such as @timeswiretap and @freeNYTimes that constantly tweet recent articles as they are posted.
  • Mashable reported two of their readers Dmitry Beniaminov and Yuri Victor discovered that if readers remove "?gwh=numbers" from the URL, this will let readers continue reading.  They also discovered if readers clear their browser caches or switch browsers once they hit 20 articles, this will also solve the problem.
  • According to Newspaper Death Watch, the Times prevents readers from reading more than 20 articles a month with a Javascript overlay.  This means the article is visible in the background with the pop-up asking the reader to subscribe in front of it.  Many browsers block Javascript by default, and the NYTClean also takes care of the HTML which overrides the Javascript.
Wall
Photo Credit: zebble
There are many different views about the paywall.  The Times is supporting their plan, confident in their prices and the idea.  Times writer David Carr wrote, "People, real actual people, went and reported that information, some of it at personal peril and certainly at giganitc institutional expense.  So the Times is turning toward its customers to bear some of the cost.  The Times is hardly alone: AFP, Reuters, The Associated Press, Dow Jones, the BBC and NPR are all part of a muscular journalistic ecosystem."  He admits his bias since he does write for the Times, but he writes in support of the cost and his company.

There are also other professionals who agree with the Times.  Larry Kramer wrote why he will pay the subscription fee, "I want my NY Times information frequently and easily and I will do what it takes, including paying for it, to make sure I get full access to everything produced by the 1100 journalists who work there...In the case of the Times, the content has already prove its value to me over the many years I have consumed it, in print and on line.  I know I want it and I know I need it.  I may have loved getting it for free online over the years, but I also know how good it is and that it has value to me."

However, not everyone is as positive as Carr and Kramer.  Steve Outing, a blogger, said he was disappointed in the paywall and he believes it is a bad move.  "I hope someone from the NY Times management will respond to my criticims.  If they do, I expect that the justification for this announced pricing model will be they can't do harm to the newspaper product.  I guess that's the way it is.  But in my view, this over-priced metered-paywall mistaken strategy puts the "Gray Lady" a step closer to the grave rather than getting a chance at a new life."  The Onion, a parody news source, also got their word in on the subject with an article titled, "NYTimes.com's Plan to Charge People Money For Consuming Goods, Services Called Bold Business Move."

I can see the pros and cons of the subscription service.  We will need to wait and see if readers use the methods to get around the fees or if they are willing to pay for a news source they enjoy reading.

Do you think the subscription will work out for the Times, or do you think it will negatively affect their business?
Money tunnel
Photo Credit: RambergMediaImages

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

The New York Times Paywall Subscription

On March 17, The New York Times announced their new system involving digital subscriptions. In the letter to readers, it states the transition is "...an important step that we hope you will see as an investment in The Times, one that will strengthen our ability to provide high-quality journalism to readers around the world and on any platform."  You can read the entire official announcement here.

The company announced that starting March 28, digital subscriptions would start being offered in the United States.  The plan consists of viewing 20 articles per month for free but if you view more than 20 articles you will be asked to become a subscriber.  Phone apps fall under this category asp well.  There is currently a special happening with all variations of the subscriptions, where each costs 99 cents per plan for the first four weeks.
The digital subscriptions consist of the following:

  • NYTimes.com + Smartphone App = Access from any computer or device plus an app for Blackberry, iPhone or Android smartphones. 
    •  Cost: $3.75 per week, billed every 4 weeks ($15.00)
  • NYTimes.com + Tablet App = Access from any computer or device plus an app for iPod.  Plus Times Reader 2.0 and NYTimes App for Chrome Web Store.
    • Cost: $5.00 per week, billed every 4 weeks ($20.00)
  • All Digital Access = Access from any computer or device, plus Smartphone App and Tablet App.  This is also free for all print subscribers and home delivery subscribers.  
    • Cost: $8.75 per week, billed every 4 weeks ($35.00)

This model took 14 months and 40 million dollars to develop.  All other questions are answer in their  FAQ section about the subscriptions.

Will this new payment system work?  Will other companies follow suit?  In my opinion, I do think there needs to be a business model developed for journalism online.  Television and radio forms of journalism have business methods and I do not think online journalism should be different.  Is this the right model?  Is this the right model?  Should other sites implement similar models?  This is to be determined.  In the upcoming months we will have to gauge the success of the new subscription, and see whether it is detrimental to The New York Times's business or beneficial.

Below is a video from Newsy Videos debating if this new plan will work or not.



Do you think The New York Times paywall will be effective?  Will they lose business?  Or will they be successful and set the business model?

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Social Media Critical in Japan During Earthquake & Tsunami Aftermath

Citizens of Japan have been relying on social networks such as Facebook and Twitter in the aftermath of the earthquake and tsunami which occurred on Friday.  According to CNET news, cell phone carriers such as NTT DoCoMo, Softbank, and Au were limiting calls because the networks were so congested.  Service was also very spotty throughout the country.  This caused trouble sending phone calls and text messages; it was difficult to get in touch with loved ones.

Brian Chapman, a journalist living in Tokyo, told CNET, "I saw a lot of people on the street talking on cell phones, but also long lines for every remaining pay phone...Facebook and Skype are proving to be the best ways to keep in touch."

Social media sites have been working to make their services as resourceful as possible.  Twitter posted a guide to help those in Japan to exchange information and communicate.  The U.N. has also released a list of users covering the aftermath to help followers follow the story.  Facebook has been updating information about Japan on their Global Disaster Relief page.

Below is a video from ABC World News Now, highlighting the uses of social media during and after the disaster.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Hyperlocal vs. Traditional Media

my neighborhood
Photo credit: chrisdlugosz

Hyperlocal sites have recently sprung up all over the web.  The concept has become very popular because the sites exclusively focus on the place they are writing about, and even small towns like to know the news on Main Street.  Sites such as TBD, Patch, EveryBlock.com, Outside.in and NeighborsGo....  The success of thehave sprung up everywhere to report localized news. These sites however, is still to be determined.
According to Newspaper Death Watch, most hyperlocal sites face similar barriers. "Small audiences are difficult to monetize in the first place; finding and converting advertisers to reach small audiences is expensive; advertisers are reluctant to spend a lot of money on online ads in general, particularly when the audiences are small."  TBD cut one third of their staff (12 employees) at the end of February, six months after its launch.  This occured because there was low traffic to the site.  Some critics say the rest of hyperlocal sites will be next. 

Ad Age Mediaworks reported on a study in which types of media outlets many local consumers get their weekly news from.  Out of one-thousand localists surveyed; 91 percent watch local television news once a week, 80 percent check print newspapers, 79 percent listen to the radio, 61 percent check local websites and 59 percent check local television websites.  Hyperlocal websites that offer community news are a bit behind with 38 percent weekly use. Two percent of localists use these sites as their primary source of news.

However, most sites are staying positive. Patch has more than 800 sites, and AOL spent 50 million dollars on the project.  The CEO of Patch is also planning to add 200 more locations in the near future.  Another site, NeighborsGo, has been up and running for two and a half years.

Ultimatley, the survival of hyperlocal sites will depend on how well they can compete with national news sources.

Monday, March 7, 2011

The Today Show Promotes New Website

Studio 1A
Photo credit: Edgar Zuniga Jr.
If you cannot get to a television for your daily fix of your favorite program, don't worry.  Television programs have started to extend themselves online, including NBC's Today Show.  According to The New York Times, on Tuesday, March 8, the show will be producing a one-time web cast in addition to their regular programming.  The web cast will be called "The Today.com Show."  It will take place from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and will be hosted by Hoda Kotb and Kathie Lee Gifford.

The webcast is to promote the new website which was redesigned to emphasize video clips.  It will go behind the scenes and give viewers a chance to see what goes on in Studio 1A.  You can check out the redesigned site here.  It took two years of research and development to get the site to where it is now.  Viewers can now easily navigate and find everything from the morning's show.

The site is also utilizing social media with their Twitter, Facebook, and tumblr.com accounts in addition to helping Today Show anchor Meredith Viera tweet for the first time tomorrow during the cast.

New websites that emphasize video are sure to become more popular.  According to Alexa, a web information company, YouTube.com is the third most popular site globally.  Video online is easily accessible and mostly free; when consumers miss their shows or would like to watch clips, they turn to the web.  More and more companies are utilizing the power of the web, and it will be interesting to see how it turns out.

Friday, March 4, 2011

Charlie Sheen #Winning on Twitter


Audio version of this blog post

The Charlie Sheen media circus is still in progress.  He is everywhere in the media, especially social media.  As he would say, Sheen is #winning when it comes to Twitter.  He reached one million followers in just over 24 hours.  According to USA Today, "The actual figure, confirmed by the Guinness Book of World Records today: It took Sheen 25 hours and 17 minutes, between March 1 and 2, to reach 1 million followers."
Photo by xotoko

Sheen thanked his followers from his Twitter, "In all sincerity... Thank you Twitter followers that helped get me to 1 M in 24 hours!!! #teamsheen."  As I am writing this post, Sheen has 1,569,150 followers 
and the followers will keep coming.

It was also reported that Sheen signed a deal with a company Ad.ly.  The company hires celebrities who use social  media to sell and endorse products.  Supposedly, the company even helped Sheen set up his   Twitter and also explained how it worked.

No matter what one thinks of Charlie Sheen...most can agree he is a doing a great job at utilizing media to advertise himself.  Personally, I have even heard "marketing genius" being thrown around.  We will have to wait and see if Christina Aguilera and other celebrities who need a career boost will follow the Sheen model use of media.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Charlie Sheen's Public Meltdown

So far, this is Charlie Sheen's year.  As E! would describe it, "Meltdown 2011."  He is everywhere in the media.  He dissed Alcoholic Anonymous, insulted the "Two and a Half Men" creator Chuck Lorre, he insulted CBS and asked for a raise, spoke on talk shows on major stations such as Piers Morgan, Today Show, 20/20, Dateline, etc.  Watch some of his interview on Good Morning America below.


The latest thing is that Sheen joined Twitter yesterday evening.  He tweeted "Questions..? I'm here for my people..Bring it!! #Tigerblood."  This goes along with a statement he made in his 20/20 interview, "You borrow my brain for five seconds and just be like dude, can't handle it, unplug this bastard. It fires in a way that is, I don't know, maybe not from this terrestrial realm. When you've got tiger blood and Adonis DNA, it's like, get with the program dude."  #Tigerblood is now trending on Twitter and media outlets are watching anxiously at what he will tweet next or who he will follow next. 

His every move is being watched.  For example, E! online has a link to everything Charlie Sheen here. This has become the norm in society today.  When Britney Spears had her meltdown and shaved her head, the press was there to cover every minute.  When Lindsay Lohan was in her downward spiral, there was a huge media circus surrounding everything she did, and especially when she was in court - you could watch her walking into court live on almost every news station. 

America today has a "celeb culture" and all areas of journalism have adjusted to keep up with this.  Before this celeb-culture-journalism, celebrities were not as overexposed as they are today.  The overall demand has changed this, as well as social media and online sites.  There are magazines, television stations, websites, etc. completely devoted to celebrities.  This Charlie Sheen media circus shows how someone, especially a celebrity, cannot make one move without it being recorded and instantly available to everyone who wants it.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Serene Branson Grammy Scare

Even though the Grammy's were a couple of weeks ago, Serene Branson and her Grammy report is still a viral story on the Internet.  Branson is a reporter for CBS Los Angeles, and while she was on scene in downtown LA she stumbled over her words and could not be understood.


The video instantly went viral and soon there were YouTube videos all over the Internet with titles such as "Funny," "CBS Reporter Serene Branson Grammy lol the media is so dumb," "Grammy Reporter MESSES UP Live," etc.  Soon after, it was reported Branson may have suffered a stroke.  Some of those who posted comments about the incident removed or changed them after they found out she may have had a stroke.  For example, in an article about the video by blogger Dave Lee; he stated that The Daily Record posted, "Serene Branson was presenting for CBS2 at the biggest music bas in the world when she struggled to pout together a coherent sentence."  It was replaced with, "CBS reporter Serene Branson was last night under observation in hospital after it was feared she may have suffered a stroke live on air during the Grammy Awards broadcast."

There are many different opinions on this incident.  Some think that the incident still is funny even after the reports, and they say she was just nervous or forgot what she was going to say.  Others think the comments making fun of Branson are too harsh and should be removed; especially after she was looked at medically.

One of the critics was Nir Rosen, a journalist who held a position at New York University.  One of his tweets was, "i apologize for being insensitive, its always wrong, thats obvious, but i'm rolling my eyes at all the attention she will get."  Rosen resigned after the tweets he made about the incident. The University condoned his comments.

You can watch Branson talking about the incident and how she is doing now here.  This incident shows the impact of videos and social media today, as well as the instant news demand.  Twenty years ago, Rosen maynot have been condemned for his comments and publications would not have had to change their articles because they did not post news instantly.  Now, when comments are made online and articles are posted, the author must be ready for the possible positive or negative effects his or her comments can have.  The author must also be ready for the possibility he or she spoke too soon.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Egypt & The Media

     The conflict in Egypt has been prominent in many news outlet's top stories of the last couple of weeks.  According to the News Coverage Index, conducted by Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism, Egypt was 56 percent of mainstream media coverage during the weeks of January 24 and January 31.  According to the Index, "Not only was that easily the biggest overseas story in a single week since PEJ began its News Coverage Index in January 2007.  It registered as the fourth-biggest story of any kind-trailing only two weeks in the 2008 presidential campaign and the aftermath of the January 8, 2011 Tucson shooting spree."
EGypTarticleLarge
Photo credit: Globaltechfirm
     During the week of January 31, the story was also prominent in non-traditional types of media, such as blogs.  57 percent of the links in the blog-verse were recorded as about the conflict in Egypt. This outlet of blogs gave consumers a plethora of information as well as links to learn everything they wanted to know about the conflict.  The consumers did not necessarily have to go to the traditional news source, such as television or newspapers.
     These blogs gave readers an outlet to discuss the conflict and a chance to express their opinions on how the conflict was being covered in the media.  This shows that readers are not only using traditional news sources to get their news about international conflicts, they are also turning to the world of blogging, which has been becoming more and more prominent.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

AOL and Huffington Post Combine

The biggest news in media this week is the 315 million dollar deal where AOL has bought the Huffington Post.  The ultimate goal of this AOL purchase is for both to become a content powerhouse.  In this day and age people get news from many different sources, and becoming a leader in content would no doubt boost AOL's credibility.  The content will include "all Huffington Post and AOL content, including Engadget, TechCrunch, Moviefone, MapQuest, Black Voices, PopEater, AOL Music, AOL Latino, AuthoBlog, Patch, StyleList, and other sites" according to paidContent.org.

Arianna Huffington was announced editor-in-chief and president of the Huffington Post Media Group.  The media world, as well as myself, will be eager to see if this merge will turn out to be a success.
If you would like to learn more, check out an CNN Piers Morgan interview with Arianna Huffington and AOL's Tim Armstrong here.

Arriana Huffington
Photo credit: jdlasica


Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Welcome

Hello!
My name is Amanda and I will be blogging over the next semester for my information systems management class.  I chose to blog about the changing journalism industry as well as current industry events.
If you would like, check back in once a week and feel free to comment on my thoughts, as well as add your own!

Keyboard
Photo Credit: webhamster